送交者: 不懂相对论 于 2011-11-17, 13:29:15:

回答: I disagree, especially about revenue neutral. 由 steven 于 2011-11-17, 13:08:33:

• They actually paid less tax, that is why they should - silxirt (83 bytes) 2011-11-17, 14:47:01 (629105)
  • What do you mean "they should"? Who defines "should" (无内容) - 不懂相对论 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:06:43 (629113)
    • If you read the context it would not be difficult: THE RICH! (无内容) - silxirt (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:29:30 (629119)
  • less than who? - eddie (200 bytes) 2011-11-17, 14:50:13 (629107)
    • Less than what they should! Canada is neutral, but - silxirt (30 bytes) 2011-11-17, 14:53:40 (629110)
      • 谁的税都不用加，但进口税和关税给大大的加上去就可以了 - ABf (206 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:25:22 (629117)
        • agree, the real problem is the free trade itself (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 16:58:36 (629134)
        • 坚决支持大搞贸易保护主义 - ABf (251 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:45:32 (629123)
      • 解决的办法是恢复封建领主制度(fiefdom) - ABf (178 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:11:07 (629115)
        • 为了鼓励有钱的人多生孩子可以取消传给直系后代的遗产的遗产税 - ABf (145 bytes) 2011-11-17, 15:29:05 (629118)
• 你说的很对，这里没有绝对的逻辑可言。 (无内容) - luckystar1 (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:39:12 (629093)
• All those guys I mentioned have never paid tax, that is a loophole. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2011-11-17, 13:36:36 (629092)

加跟贴